Key Takeaways
- New flagship, live now: Grok 4.7 shipped on September 21, 2026 and is live on APIYI as
grok-4.7, available in thedefault/svip/CodexResponsesgroups - A bigger base model: 2.1T parameters, about 40% larger than Grok 4.6’s 1.5T, with a longer reinforcement learning run weighted toward tasks that take hours
- Biggest gains in coding agents: independent testing by Artificial Analysis puts Terminal-Bench 4.0 at 33% (up from 18%) and DeepSWE v1.1 at 73% (up from 65%)
- Same price as the last generation: $2 / $6 per million tokens (input / output), $0.50 for cached reads, with a second tier above 200K, matching xAI’s official pricing
- Same unit price, more tokens per task: Artificial Analysis measured roughly twice the output tokens of Grok 4.6 on the same task set, so cost per task goes up
Background
When Grok 4.6 shipped on August 7, it kept Grok 4.5’s 1.5T-parameter base and added only post-training. Six weeks later, Grok 4.7 takes a different route: a larger new base model at 2.1T parameters, a longer reinforcement learning run, and more training weight on multi-hour tasks. xAI describes it as “a notable improvement over Grok 4.6 at the same price and speed.” Its supplemental training data also includes SpaceX engineering material such as Starlink satellite telemetry, manufacturing records, and engineering failure logs, which helps explain its strong result on the EEBench electrical-engineering benchmark. On launch day Grok 4.7 went live in the Grok app, Cursor, Grok Build, and the xAI API, and GitHub Copilot added it the same day. Musk also sketched the roadmap: Grok 4.8 as “a meaningful step up,” Grok 4.9 in the Astra / Fable class, and Grok 5 aiming for the frontier lead, with no dates given.Detailed Analysis
Benchmarks
Independent testing (Artificial Analysis, retrieved 2026/9/24)
xAI self-reported
Artificial Analysis updated its Intelligence Index after August. The 46 and 44 above are from the same index version and should not be compared with the 61 reported when Grok 4.6 launched. xAI’s own numbers and the independent results differ slightly on benchmarks with the same name (for example, xAI reports 38% on Terminal-Bench 4.0), so the two tables are kept separate to make the sources easy to check.
Core Features
New 2.1T base
About 40% more parameters than Grok 4.6, plus a longer reinforcement learning run weighted toward multi-hour tasks
Self-verification on long tasks
Stronger self-checking on long trajectories; multi-hour coding tasks such as SWE-Marathon improve by 14 points
Four reasoning levels
Officially supports
low / medium / high / xhigh, with high as the default; most top independent results come from xhigh500K context
Text and image input, text output, no output length cap; requests above 200K are billed entirely at the second tier
Specifications
Practical Use
Recommended Scenarios
- Long-running coding agents: the largest gains are on long-task benchmarks such as Terminal-Bench and SWE-Marathon, a good fit for automation that works in a codebase for hours
- Knowledge-work agents: GDPval-AA and AA-Briefcase both rank second only to Claude Fable 5.1, a good fit for report writing, research, and analysis
- Engineering and hardware questions: training included SpaceX engineering material, and it does well on the EEBench electrical-engineering benchmark
- Codex and other Responses clients: available in the
CodexResponsesgroup for use directly in Codex
Code Example
grok-4.6 only needs model changed to grok-4.7. Web search, X search, code execution, and MCP tools work the same way as across the Grok 4.x series; see the Grok overview.
Best Practices
- Pick the reasoning level per task:
lowormediumsaves noticeably on simple Q&A; keepxhighfor long coding chains and complex analysis - Don’t hard-code reasoning parameters in cross-model code: support for reasoning-effort parameters varies across Grok 4.x models, so shared wrappers should check the model before sending it; see Chat and reasoning
- Watch the 200K tier on long prompts: requests above 200K are billed entirely at the second tier, so split long documents where you can and let prefix caching absorb repeated system prompts
Pricing and Availability
Pricing
All four billing items match xAI’s official pricing, billed in tiers:
Available groups:
default, svip, and CodexResponses. Choose the group when you create your token.
Stack With Top-Up Promotions
Top-ups earn a tiered bonus based on the amount of each top-up, which lowers your effective price further. See the top-up promotions for details.Summary
Grok 4.7 moves to a larger base model than Grok 4.6, from 1.5T to 2.1T parameters, at an unchanged price. The biggest gains are on coding-agent benchmarks, with Terminal-Bench 4.0 nearly doubling. On the overall index it still trails GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Fable 5 by 1 to 4 points, but on knowledge-work tasks it now ranks second only to Claude Fable 5.1. If your workload is long-running coding agents or knowledge-work automation, trygrok-4.7 directly. If your tasks are simple and cost-sensitive, compare token usage on real tasks first, because this generation keeps the unit price but uses more tokens. For the lowest unit price, grok-4.3 (1M context, $1.25 / $2.50) is still an option.
Sources: SpaceXAI release notes
docs.x.ai/developers/release-notes, Artificial Analysis artificialanalysis.ai/articles/benchmarking-grok-4-7, Decrypt, llm-stats, GitHub Changelog; data retrieved September 24, 2026. The model is live on APIYI; get a key and start calling it.